Thursday, June 5, 2025

Comparison of Emeralds from the Chitral District, Pakistan, with other Pakistani and Afghan Emeralds

Comparison of Emeralds from the Chitral District, Pakistan, with other Pakistani and Afghan Emeralds" by Hanser et al. (2023), suitable for gemology students:


๐Ÿ”ท Origin and Location

  • Emerald Deposit: Chitral District, north-western Pakistan (discovered in 2021)

  • Geological Zone: Outside the traditional “Emerald Belt” (Indus Suture Zone)

  • Host Rocks: Quartz- and mica-rich metapelites of the Arkari Formation, intruded by pegmatitic leucogranite


๐Ÿชจ Rock Types and Formation

  • Chitral emeralds form in schist-hosted environments

  • Hosted in quartz- and mica-rich metamorphic rocks

  • Similar to emeralds in Afghanistan's Panjshir and Swat (Pakistan), but geochemically distinct


๐ŸŽจ Color and Diaphaneity

  • Colors: Light green to dark green

  • Transparency: Mostly transparent; higher-quality than earlier samples

  • Notable: Deeper-colored samples show potential for gem trade


๐Ÿ” Inclusions

  • Chitral Inclusions:

    • Two-phase inclusions (gas + liquid)

    • Hollow growth tubes (some with yellowish precipitates)

    • Surface-reaching inclusions: quartz, plagioclase (andesine/oligoclase), K-feldspar, phlogopite (main dark mica), rare muscovite

  • No three-phase inclusions, which is key to distinguishing from Panjshir, Swat, and Laghman emeralds

  • Laghman: Biotite and three-phase inclusions

  • Swat: Black opaque minerals (spinel, pyrite), talc, carbonate, and mica


๐Ÿ”ฌ Optical & Physical Properties

PropertyChitral Emeralds
Refractive Index1.580–1.590
Birefringence0.008–0.009
SG2.71–2.74
UV-Vis-NIRStrong Fe²⁺ absorption (~830 nm)
Raman SpectraStrong Type II H₂O peaks

๐Ÿงช Chemical Composition (Major/Trace Elements)

By EPMA (Oxides, wt.%):

  • SiO₂: ~63.6–64.4%

  • Al₂O₃: ~15.3–16.1%

  • FeO: ~0.45–0.63%

  • MgO: ~1.6–1.9%

  • Na₂O: ~1.5%

  • BeO: Fixed ~13.6%

By LA-ICP-MS (ppm):

  • High in:

    • Li: 938–1359 ppm (significantly higher than Swat, Panjshir, Laghman)

    • Cs: Up to 5782 ppm

    • Na: ~11,000–12,000 ppm

    • Mg: ~9,000–11,000 ppm

  • Low in:

    • Mn: ~15–26 ppm

    • Ti: ~11–18 ppm

    • Zn: ~13–18 ppm


๐Ÿ’ก Cause of Color

  • Chromophores: Chromium (Cr), Vanadium (V), and Iron (Fe)

  • Chitral emeralds show:

    • Fe²⁺ dominant (responsible for bluish-green tone)

    • Moderate Cr and V contents

  • Fe₂⁺ feature in UV-Vis (~830 nm) is stronger than Cr³⁺ and V³⁺, indicating schist-hosted genesis


๐Ÿงฌ Elements (in ppm)

ElementRangeCharacteristic
Li938–1359High – diagnostic for Chitral
Cs1151–5782High – separates from Swat
Cr514–1197Color contributor
V222–391Color contributor
Na~11,000–12,000Higher than Khaltaro
Fe~3413–4164Bluish-green tint source

๐Ÿ”Ž Diagnostic Features for Origin Determination

PropertyChitral vs Others
InclusionsNo three-phase; phlogopite-rich
Fe²⁺ AbsorptionStronger than Cr³⁺ & V³⁺
Li & Cs LevelsSignificantly higher
Water Type (Raman)Dominant Type II H₂O peaks
Growth FeaturesWeak zoning; no sawtooth structures

๐Ÿ“ Summary for Students

  • Chitral emeralds are schist-hosted, Fe²⁺-rich, and alkali-rich

  • No three-phase inclusions (unlike Panjshir or Swat)

  • High levels of Li and Cs make them chemically distinct

  • Excellent for origin studies due to inclusion types, spectroscopic patterns, and chemical profiles

  • Increasing mining activity in Chitral makes identification increasingly important in gem markets

No comments:

Comparison of Emeralds from the Chitral District, Pakistan, with other Pakistani and Afghan Emeralds

Comparison of Emeralds from the Chitral District, Pakistan, with other Pakistani and Afghan Emeralds" by Hanser et al. (2023), suitabl...