Gemology Hub / Gems Hub / Minerals Hub
Labels
- Organic Gemstones (8)
- Inorganic gemstones (6)
- Videos (5)
- Gemstones (2)
- rare gems (2)
- Important websites (1)
- Mimetoliths (1)
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Wednesday, August 6, 2025
๐ฅ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐๐ป๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ต๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ
Introduction:
A light purplish-blue sapphire weighing 15.84 carats was submitted to the Laboratoire Franรงais de Gemmologie (LFG) for testing. This stone turned out to be a synthetic sapphire, but what made it especially interesting was the presence of Rose channels — a feature usually seen in natural sapphires.
What Are Rose Channels?
Rose channels are tiny hollow tubes inside the sapphire that always appear at the points where twin layers (called "twin lamellae") meet. These channels are positioned along the edges of certain crystal faces and form angles of about 90 degrees. Normally, these are features of natural sapphires.
Why Is This Discovery Important?
These channels and twin lines are common in natural sapphires, but very rare in synthetic ones. However, this sample — a Verneuil flame-fusion synthetic sapphire — had both features clearly visible. It challenges the assumption that Rose channels prove a gem is natural.
Other Findings from Testing:
-
Under the microscope: Clouds of bubbles and twinning planes were observed, typical of synthetic gems.
-
Under UV light:
-
No reaction under long-wave UV.
-
Strong blue glow under short-wave UV.
-
-
X-ray fluorescence testing showed no gallium, supporting that it’s synthetic.
-
DiamondView imaging revealed curved growth lines, a feature of Verneuil synthetic sapphires.
-
FTIR (Infrared) spectroscopy showed no absorption in the 1500–4000 cm⁻¹ range, where Rose channels in natural stones usually show signals.
Conclusion:
Even though Rose channels and twin planes are normally signs of a natural sapphire, this case proves they can also appear in synthetic sapphires. Therefore, these features alone cannot be used to confirm whether a stone is natural.
References / Source Credit:
This article is adapted and simplified from:
Hennebois, U., Delaunay, A., Herreweghe, A., Karampelas, S., & Fritsch, E. (2022). Synthetic sapphire with Rose channels. Gems & Gemology, 58(3), p. 387.
Available at: https://hal.science/hal-04001745v1
Primary Keywords (Main focus):
-
Rose channels in synthetic sapphire
-
Synthetic sapphire inclusions
-
Verneuil sapphire identification
-
Twinning planes in corundum
๐ Secondary Keywords (Supporting terms):
-
Synthetic vs natural sapphire
-
Boehmite needles in sapphires
-
Flame-fusion synthetic gemstones
-
DiamondView gem testing
-
FTIR spectroscopy in gemstones
-
Corundum rose channels
-
CIGTL gem testing
-
Gemology sapphire features
Monday, July 14, 2025
Thursday, June 5, 2025
Comparison of Emeralds from the Chitral District, Pakistan, with other Pakistani and Afghan Emeralds
Comparison of Emeralds from the Chitral District, Pakistan, with other Pakistani and Afghan Emeralds" by Hanser et al. (2023), suitable for gemology students:
๐ท Origin and Location
-
Emerald Deposit: Chitral District, north-western Pakistan (discovered in 2021)
-
Geological Zone: Outside the traditional “Emerald Belt” (Indus Suture Zone)
-
Host Rocks: Quartz- and mica-rich metapelites of the Arkari Formation, intruded by pegmatitic leucogranite
๐ชจ Rock Types and Formation
-
Chitral emeralds form in schist-hosted environments
-
Hosted in quartz- and mica-rich metamorphic rocks
-
Similar to emeralds in Afghanistan's Panjshir and Swat (Pakistan), but geochemically distinct
๐จ Color and Diaphaneity
-
Colors: Light green to dark green
-
Transparency: Mostly transparent; higher-quality than earlier samples
-
Notable: Deeper-colored samples show potential for gem trade
๐ Inclusions
-
Chitral Inclusions:
-
Two-phase inclusions (gas + liquid)
-
Hollow growth tubes (some with yellowish precipitates)
-
Surface-reaching inclusions: quartz, plagioclase (andesine/oligoclase), K-feldspar, phlogopite (main dark mica), rare muscovite
-
-
No three-phase inclusions, which is key to distinguishing from Panjshir, Swat, and Laghman emeralds
-
Laghman: Biotite and three-phase inclusions
-
Swat: Black opaque minerals (spinel, pyrite), talc, carbonate, and mica
๐ฌ Optical & Physical Properties
| Property | Chitral Emeralds |
|---|---|
| Refractive Index | 1.580–1.590 |
| Birefringence | 0.008–0.009 |
| SG | 2.71–2.74 |
| UV-Vis-NIR | Strong Fe²⁺ absorption (~830 nm) |
| Raman Spectra | Strong Type II H₂O peaks |
๐งช Chemical Composition (Major/Trace Elements)
By EPMA (Oxides, wt.%):
-
SiO₂: ~63.6–64.4%
-
Al₂O₃: ~15.3–16.1%
-
FeO: ~0.45–0.63%
-
MgO: ~1.6–1.9%
-
Na₂O: ~1.5%
-
BeO: Fixed ~13.6%
By LA-ICP-MS (ppm):
-
High in:
-
Li: 938–1359 ppm (significantly higher than Swat, Panjshir, Laghman)
-
Cs: Up to 5782 ppm
-
Na: ~11,000–12,000 ppm
-
Mg: ~9,000–11,000 ppm
-
-
Low in:
-
Mn: ~15–26 ppm
-
Ti: ~11–18 ppm
-
Zn: ~13–18 ppm
-
๐ก Cause of Color
-
Chromophores: Chromium (Cr), Vanadium (V), and Iron (Fe)
-
Chitral emeralds show:
-
Fe²⁺ dominant (responsible for bluish-green tone)
-
Moderate Cr and V contents
-
-
Fe₂⁺ feature in UV-Vis (~830 nm) is stronger than Cr³⁺ and V³⁺, indicating schist-hosted genesis
๐งฌ Elements (in ppm)
| Element | Range | Characteristic |
|---|---|---|
| Li | 938–1359 | High – diagnostic for Chitral |
| Cs | 1151–5782 | High – separates from Swat |
| Cr | 514–1197 | Color contributor |
| V | 222–391 | Color contributor |
| Na | ~11,000–12,000 | Higher than Khaltaro |
| Fe | ~3413–4164 | Bluish-green tint source |
๐ Diagnostic Features for Origin Determination
| Property | Chitral vs Others |
|---|---|
| Inclusions | No three-phase; phlogopite-rich |
| Fe²⁺ Absorption | Stronger than Cr³⁺ & V³⁺ |
| Li & Cs Levels | Significantly higher |
| Water Type (Raman) | Dominant Type II H₂O peaks |
| Growth Features | Weak zoning; no sawtooth structures |
๐ Summary for Students
-
Chitral emeralds are schist-hosted, Fe²⁺-rich, and alkali-rich
-
No three-phase inclusions (unlike Panjshir or Swat)
-
High levels of Li and Cs make them chemically distinct
-
Excellent for origin studies due to inclusion types, spectroscopic patterns, and chemical profiles
-
Increasing mining activity in Chitral makes identification increasingly important in gem markets
Origin of Negative Crystals in Gemstones
Wednesday, June 4, 2025
Wednesday, February 26, 2025
Sodalite from Myanmar vs. Afghanistan: A Complete Comparison
Sodalite is a fascinating gemstone known for its vibrant blue hues and unique tenebrescence, the ability to change color under UV light. In recent years, high-quality sodalite (also called hackmanite) has been sourced from Myanmar and Afghanistan. If you are a gem collector, jeweler, or enthusiast looking to understand the differences between these two sources, this comprehensive comparison will help you make an informed choice.
1. General Characteristics
Tenebrescence: Both Myanmar and Afghan sodalite exhibit tenebrescence, allowing them to change color when exposed to UV light.
Transparency: Afghan sodalite is typically more transparent, whereas Burmese sodalite tends to have more inclusions.
2. Transparency & Clarity
Afghan Sodalite: Cleaner, with fewer inclusions and higher transparency.
Burmese Sodalite: More included, often with visible fractures and foreign material.
3. Color and Tenebrescence
Burmese Sodalite: Usually has a deeper, richer purple or violet color.
Afghan Sodalite: Ranges from very light violet to medium purple.
Tenebrescence: Afghan sodalite generally has a stronger tenebrescence effect than Burmese sodalite.
4. UV Fluorescence and Phosphorescence
Afghan Sodalite: Strong yellow to orange fluorescence under long-wave UV, moderate to strong white fluorescence under short-wave UV.
Burmese Sodalite: Weaker fluorescence, typically greenish-yellow in fractures.
Phosphorescence: Afghan sodalite shows stronger phosphorescence than Burmese sodalite.
5. Refractive Index & Specific Gravity
Afghan Sodalite: Refractive index of 1.45 - 1.48.
Burmese Sodalite: Refractive index of 1.47 - 1.48.
Specific Gravity: Burmese sodalite sometimes has a higher SG (up to 2.44) due to the presence of nepheline inclusions.
6. Spectroscopy & Chemistry
Both types contain traces of sulfur, which contribute to tenebrescence.
Afghan sodalite exhibits additional spectral features in UV-Vis-NIR spectra, such as peaks at 410-412 nm, 277 nm, and 313 nm, which are not found in Burmese sodalite.
7. Treatment
Afghan Sodalite: Often oiled to enhance clarity.
Burmese Sodalite: May also undergo oiling, especially after cutting.
Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?
If you want a gemstone with strong tenebrescence, Afghan hackmanite is the better choice.
If you prefer a deep, rich purple or violet color, Burmese sodalite is ideal.
For higher transparency and fewer inclusions, Afghan sodalite is superior.
If you appreciate UV fluorescence and phosphorescence, Afghan sodalite offers stronger effects.
Final Thoughts
Both Myanmar and Afghan sodalite have their own unique appeal. Whether you’re a gem enthusiast, collector, or jeweler, understanding these differences can help you make a more informed decision. For investment or aesthetic purposes, consider your preference for tenebrescence, clarity, and fluorescence when choosing between these two beautiful varieties of sodalite.
Title: Sodalite from Myanmar vs. Afghanistan – Differences, Color, & Value
Meta Description: Discover the key differences between Burmese and Afghan sodalite, including color, tenebrescence, transparency, UV fluorescence, and treatment.
Introduction quiz
๐ Gemology Quiz 1. What does gemology study? The study of rocks only The study of gemstones and their p...
-
Gemstone MCQs Quiz Test Your Knowledge in Gemology Part 6 1. A 2-carat fine-quality...




